There is never one perfect plan when you set out to achieve something. Planning and saving for retirement is no different. There are many different strategies and investment vehicles available which may provide a suitable outcome. However, the experience of the investor or retiree along the journey can differ depending on the plan chosen and investment vehicle used.
One such vehicle is a Self-Managed Super Fund or ‘SMSF’ which is a type of superannuation fund and can be a suitable vehicle for retirement savings for certain clients. We find that pre retirees and retirees often ask ‘is an SMSF right for me’? We feel there is already enough promotion of SMSF happening so we would like to provide our anecdotal experience from real clients in our client base who have already gone done that path and had negative experiences when using an SMSF and had exited these arrangements before meeting with us.
We have observed two types of clients who have found that an SMSF wasn’t for them. The first group were more financially astute clients, tertiary educated professionals with higher balances in their superannuation (we will call them Group 1) and the second group were less financially savvy clients, working in clerical and trade roles with smaller superannuation balances (we will call them Group 2).
Group 1 clients normally ended up with an SMSF- with the promise of more control, investment choice and cost economies of scale. One client remarked it seemed like a smart thing to do and to be able to tell his friends about. However, the feedback we received was that they ended up with was more work managing the fund (during their limited personal non work time), numerous headaches and responsibilities which provided an added burden on them, and unnecessary complexity added to their already busy lives. Setting up an SMSF fund and running one was like managing a small business and the process of closing down the fund was arduous, long and for one client ‘a nightmare’. These clients were also not using the SMSF for strategic purposes such as holding direct property or business premises which would require such a structure. So the outcome was higher costs than could have been achieved in other superannuation structures and with investment returns that didn’t compensate them for the extra cost, time and complexity.
Our Group 2 clients unfortunately ended up with an SMSF after being sold on a property related investment first and then having an SMSF arranged as part of the transaction. There are many operators often linked to sales of new property projects who exist outside of the licensed financial advice space – providing unofficial investment advice without the qualifications, regulation and consumer protections that licenced financial advisers offer. There exist considerable conflicts of interest where these promoters are paid solely on selling one particular property to as many clients as possible (whereas licensed financial advisers cannot receive commissions or invectives from superannuation and investment providers and are instead paid transparent fees by clients directly for their advice).
Our clients said they felt pushed into a property deal with an SMSF set up later to hold the investment. Some had balances far below the suggested minimums required to make an SMSF viable. These clients did not have the experience, expertise or desire to be the trustee of their own fund. They said they found the whole experience complex, confusing and far beyond their comfort levels. With all of their retirement savings wrapped in one single investment they also had a massive risk of having all their eggs in one basket (trustees of other types of superannuation funds wouldn’t allow this diversification risk).
Alternatively, modern superannuation platforms with a professional trustee can provide many of the benefits clients sought in an SMSF. These clients can enjoy competitive cost structures, extensive investment choice and the many superannuation strategies and taxation advantages of superannuation that exist in all superannuation types.
But unlike an SMSF- they also have very low levels of responsibility and time involvement, and these two groups of clients now feel more comfortable, less stressed and have a suitable vehicle for their retirement savings without the hassle of an SMSF.
The Commonwealth government’s MoneySmart site has an objective overview of SMSF’s which outlines key considerations- https://moneysmart.gov.au/how-super-works/self-managed-super-funds-smsf.
If you are considering if an SMSF is the right vehicle for your retirement savings- please get in touch and we can ensure you are using a suitable vehicle in the journey up to and through retirement.
The information contained on this site is general in nature and has been prepared without considering your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should, before acting on any advice, consider its appropriateness to your circumstances (including your objectives, financial situation and needs). You should also consider the relevant PDS before making any decision about any product.